Useful first. Traceable always.
The standard Workacross applies to guides, comparisons, and tools.
Owner official-source compliance review: no counsel. This is not legal advice or a guarantee against every claim.
Start with the source
Claims that could affect tax, legal, insurance, or financial decisions should link to a named authority or provider source. The source, publisher, effective period, and last-checked date should remain visible to the reader.
Separate facts from summaries
Raw values, eligibility, and source context come before labels or rankings. A visual label such as Excellent, Good, or OK is a Workacross summary, never an official rating.
How a guide is written and checked
Drafts are produced with AI assistance from a set of named primary sources: federal and cantonal authorities, the France–Switzerland agreements, and published premium and rate tables. A draft is not a publication. Before anything goes live, a named person reads each factual claim back against the authority it cites, and the date that source was last opened is recorded on the guide. That person is shown on the guide as the editorial checker, with their role.
Professional review is never implied
Published editorial content is approved in the editorial pipeline. Professional review is a separate fact: a reviewer is named on the guide only when a real person has checked the claims, and editorial approval is never presented as professional review.
Corrections and independence
Corrections should be visible and dated. We do not accept payment for a higher editorial rank. Commercial relationships, if introduced, must be disclosed. AI may assist internal research or drafting, but it must not publish unsupervised regulated advice.
What we do not publish
We do not publish private member data, unreviewed provider rankings, invented credentials, fabricated engagement metrics, or a document a member uploaded. Work in progress stays unpublished until its editorial state and source record are ready.
